This week my blog post will
discuss the positive results research can have on children and families that
participate in the studies. As I read
the assigned chapter in our text this week-I realized that research can become
skewed and actually cause more harm to the participants than good. “Though research is essential if our
understanding of human development is to be advanced, the history of research
is littered with examples of harm caused by researchers to their subjects. (Mac Naughton, Rolfe, & Siraj-Blatchford,
2010). In effort to share some positive
light on research-I found an article about research conducted at Educare
schools (www.educareshcool.org) related
to my topic of research-continuity of care.
Continuity of care is a process that can prepare
children for school and is not subjected to one type of educational
program. Continuity of care offers the
child to become familiar with their educational surroundings and their
teachers; in return gives them a better chance at school readiness with
developed social/emotional and cognitive skills. Educare schools have had researchers from the
Frank Porter Graham Child Development Institute (FGP) conduct a research study
to prove that continuity of care has positive results even for children that
are from families that are living in poverty or are learning to speak English
as a second language. “Beginning with
two Schools in 2005 and now covering 12 Schools, the FPG study shows that
low-income children (including children with limited proficiency in English)
who enroll in Educare as infants or toddlers enter Kindergarten with the same
skills as their middle-income peers.” (Educare,
2013).
This is positive research that did not harm any
students but shows the positive effects of how continuity of care can have on a
child despite their socio-economic standing.
The Educare research proves that continuity of care would be beneficial
to children and allows them opportunities that would prepare them for school just
as prepared as their peers have that grow up in homes with that have parents
with higher incomes.
For more information about the Educare study; you
can visit the following links: http://www.educareschools.org/about/pdfs/Demonstrating-Results.pdf
or
Resources:
Educare Learning Network, (2013). Demonstrating
Results. Retrieved from http://www.educareschools.org/about/pdfs/Demonstrating-Results.pdf
Mac Naughton, G., Rolfe, S.A., &
Siraj-Blatchford, I. (2010). Doing early childhood research: International
perspectives on theory and practice (2nd ed.). Chapter 5, Ethics in Early Childhood
Research, pp73-84.New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
Hi Janine!
ReplyDeleteI loved this post. I am a huge fan of the work that FPG carries out and I have visited their facility on several occasions. I also enjoyed learning about the Educare study and plan to visit the website. Thanks so much for sharing this valuable information!
Monette
You are welcome Monette. I am glad that you enjoyed my post. I thought about you when I realized that FPG was involved in the study as you had mentioned them in your other post.
ReplyDeleteWow! Thanks Janine for your great post. This is great information and I will certainly use the FPG website in my research on how poverty effects young children.
ReplyDeleteThanks again,
Berdetta
Janine
ReplyDeleteI enjoyed reading your post!!! It is always refreshing to hear of a research that doesn't cause harm to children. I know that their families are excited about their children's social/emotional and cognitive skills development from attending the Frank Porter Graham Child Development Institute. Thank you for sharing your knowledge.
Chere'e
Hi Janine, I do enjoy reading research about children, and their families. It amazed me how reseach is always don't of the poor. As I read from chapter five, chidren are heavily represented among victims of research, as are other socially powerless groups, such as prisoners, the mentally disabled and those liveing in poverty. The likelihood of being a research victim increases if one suffers from more than one of these vulnerabilities(Naughton, Rolfe, Blatchford 2010)
ReplyDelete